<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 3 songs from 1959, 1969, 1979, 1989, 1999, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rogerbourland.com/2009/04/14/top-3-songs-from-1959-1969-1979-1989-1999-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rogerbourland.com/2009/04/14/top-3-songs-from-1959-1969-1979-1989-1999-2009/</link>
	<description>Roger Bourland writes about music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:19:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: speakingmusic</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/2009/04/14/top-3-songs-from-1959-1969-1979-1989-1999-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-132033</link>
		<dc:creator>speakingmusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogerbourland.com/blog/?p=3040#comment-132033</guid>
		<description>Very interesting...  As a classical composer who is interesting in the &quot;trends&quot; of music, I find your list particularly interesting in the style shifts over the decades. 

I think there is something to be said about marketing a song in terms of its popularity, but surely in this list it wouldn&#039;t be in the top 3 if it didn&#039;t have something else going for it.

 - something I&#039;m going to have to come back and review again and again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting&#8230;  As a classical composer who is interesting in the &#8220;trends&#8221; of music, I find your list particularly interesting in the style shifts over the decades. </p>
<p>I think there is something to be said about marketing a song in terms of its popularity, but surely in this list it wouldn&#8217;t be in the top 3 if it didn&#8217;t have something else going for it.</p>
<p> &#8211; something I&#8217;m going to have to come back and review again and again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
