<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A somewhat old dog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rogerbourland.com/2009/06/14/a-somewhat-old-dog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rogerbourland.com/2009/06/14/a-somewhat-old-dog/</link>
	<description>Roger Bourland writes about music and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:19:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sibeliusblog</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/2009/06/14/a-somewhat-old-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-141587</link>
		<dc:creator>sibeliusblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogerbourland.com/blog/?p=3279#comment-141587</guid>
		<description>Mark, I just wanted to leave a note to let you know that expanding (or &quot;feathered&quot; as we call them) beams in Sibelius can be created even quicker than in Finale as of Sibelius 6: there are new buttons on the Keypad for accel. beams and rit. beams that mean you can create them in a moment, certainly faster than 10 seconds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I just wanted to leave a note to let you know that expanding (or &#8220;feathered&#8221; as we call them) beams in Sibelius can be created even quicker than in Finale as of Sibelius 6: there are new buttons on the Keypad for accel. beams and rit. beams that mean you can create them in a moment, certainly faster than 10 seconds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Carlson</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/2009/06/14/a-somewhat-old-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-141444</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogerbourland.com/blog/?p=3279#comment-141444</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the birthday wishes!  I was just thinking about how Roger and I have now known each other for 28 years.  Since we were 28-29 years old when we met, that means we have known each other for half of our lives at this point!  

I am staying at Roger&#039;s and Daniel&#039;s house right now, as my house has been unlivable for a few days at this particular stage of the remodeling process.  So it is fun to be reading Roger&#039;s blog entries while I hear him walking around upstairs. 

About Sibelius vs. Finale, I actually think that Sibelius does look better on the printed page, though Finale has made great strides in catching up there.  I just find Finale easier and faster for me to use, and more flexible.  I will never forget how, using Sibelius, it took me about an hour to create expanding beams (through a painstaking and painful process called &quot;nested triplets,&quot; if I remember right), a process which literally would have taken about 10 seconds on Finale.  Ugh!

In my composition class last year, the 12 of us in the room divided equally between Finale and Sibelius users.  So it became a running joke that when a Sibelius user was projecting his/her score onscreen and having some trouble, the Finale people would say, &quot;Well, if you only had Finale, that would be so easy to fix!&quot;  And when a Finale person had his/her score onscreen and had a problem, the Sibelius chorus would chant, &quot;If you only had Sibelius...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the birthday wishes!  I was just thinking about how Roger and I have now known each other for 28 years.  Since we were 28-29 years old when we met, that means we have known each other for half of our lives at this point!  </p>
<p>I am staying at Roger&#8217;s and Daniel&#8217;s house right now, as my house has been unlivable for a few days at this particular stage of the remodeling process.  So it is fun to be reading Roger&#8217;s blog entries while I hear him walking around upstairs. </p>
<p>About Sibelius vs. Finale, I actually think that Sibelius does look better on the printed page, though Finale has made great strides in catching up there.  I just find Finale easier and faster for me to use, and more flexible.  I will never forget how, using Sibelius, it took me about an hour to create expanding beams (through a painstaking and painful process called &#8220;nested triplets,&#8221; if I remember right), a process which literally would have taken about 10 seconds on Finale.  Ugh!</p>
<p>In my composition class last year, the 12 of us in the room divided equally between Finale and Sibelius users.  So it became a running joke that when a Sibelius user was projecting his/her score onscreen and having some trouble, the Finale people would say, &#8220;Well, if you only had Finale, that would be so easy to fix!&#8221;  And when a Finale person had his/her score onscreen and had a problem, the Sibelius chorus would chant, &#8220;If you only had Sibelius&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Wood</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/2009/06/14/a-somewhat-old-dog/comment-page-1/#comment-141230</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogerbourland.com/blog/?p=3279#comment-141230</guid>
		<description>Mark&#039;s birthday is the 13th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark&#8217;s birthday is the 13th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
