<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.10" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damage control for Rufus Wainwright</title>
	<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/</link>
	<description>Roger Bourland writes about music and life</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.10</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: The Pagan Path</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-390</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 04:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-390</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rufus Wainwright - One Man Guy&lt;/strong&gt;

Is is possible to
separate the musician from his music in
the eye of a fan?  Rufus Wainwright
is an awesome example of this.  The
rumor mill is alive with buzz about his
many flaws as a performer, artist, and  										human being.
Still, I love his  										music.
Should I give that up,
just  										because he has some flaws?
I think  										not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rufus Wainwright - One Man Guy</strong></p>
<p>Is is possible to<br />
separate the musician from his music in<br />
the eye of a fan?  Rufus Wainwright<br />
is an awesome example of this.  The<br />
rumor mill is alive with buzz about his<br />
many flaws as a performer, artist, and  										human being.<br />
Still, I love his  										music.<br />
Should I give that up,<br />
just  										because he has some flaws?<br />
I think  										not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roger Bourland</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-345</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-345</guid>
					<description>Right on Mark, I agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Mark, I agree!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: slvrlark</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-321</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-321</guid>
					<description>On the other hand, there is no law of life that requires incredibly creative people to be obnoxious and and obnoxiously self-centered.  I think there have been many great artists who are kind, generous, and thoughtful people, and beloved by their friends.  I honestly don't think there is any direct correlation between creativity and neurosis, or creativity and mental/physical illness, an idea which 19th century mythology successfully promoted to the extent that we still have trouble shaking it now in the 21st century.

To me, it boils down to this: having a gift *never* excuses bad behavior.  I say it's high time we got rid of the "tempermental artist" model of the creative person.

And I still love Rufus's music!

-Mark Carlson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, there is no law of life that requires incredibly creative people to be obnoxious and and obnoxiously self-centered.  I think there have been many great artists who are kind, generous, and thoughtful people, and beloved by their friends.  I honestly don&#8217;t think there is any direct correlation between creativity and neurosis, or creativity and mental/physical illness, an idea which 19th century mythology successfully promoted to the extent that we still have trouble shaking it now in the 21st century.</p>
<p>To me, it boils down to this: having a gift *never* excuses bad behavior.  I say it&#8217;s high time we got rid of the &#8220;tempermental artist&#8221; model of the creative person.</p>
<p>And I still love Rufus&#8217;s music!</p>
<p>-Mark Carlson
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roger Bourland</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-312</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-312</guid>
					<description>I'm doing the book! I'm doing the book. Yeah yeah, with paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doing the book! I&#8217;m doing the book. Yeah yeah, with paper.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rosa</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-311</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-311</guid>
					<description>Rufus has an ego?  Someone should have told me.  I should never have bought/listened/enjoyed every song wrote.  I vote for Bourland!  

Ps. Do the book.  Online books ain't the real thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rufus has an ego?  Someone should have told me.  I should never have bought/listened/enjoyed every song wrote.  I vote for Bourland!  </p>
<p>Ps. Do the book.  Online books ain&#8217;t the real thing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: citrus</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-310</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-310</guid>
					<description>Some of the worst scoundrels and hypocrites I have ever known were colleagues in the ministry. But from the standpoint of what they accomplished and how well they did it, damn they were good!
Still, they leave a sour taste in my mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the worst scoundrels and hypocrites I have ever known were colleagues in the ministry. But from the standpoint of what they accomplished and how well they did it, damn they were good!<br />
Still, they leave a sour taste in my mouth.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roger Bourland</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-309</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-309</guid>
					<description>Yes Meg, I agree with you: Rufus IS a good boy. I still love his music. But my own breakthrough is that I can love his music and not worry about things he says or things people say about him. I'm a bit slow, but I get it eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Meg, I agree with you: Rufus IS a good boy. I still love his music. But my own breakthrough is that I can love his music and not worry about things he says or things people say about him. I&#8217;m a bit slow, but I get it eventually.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Meg</title>
		<link>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-308</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 05:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rogerbourland.com/blog/2006/03/29/damage-control-for-rufus-wainwright/#comment-308</guid>
					<description>A lot of writers are terribly unpleasant as well by all accounts. Fortunately for them people have less cause to experience, or even learn of, their unpleasantness. I think part of it might be that some of these people are incredibly creative but also incredibly focused on themselves and maybe that's where some of their creativity stems from. 

At the same time, nice as the idea of separating the creator from the creation is, if I were to learn that Rufus say, tortured kittens and kicked puppies, I really can't see myself continuing to buy his music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of writers are terribly unpleasant as well by all accounts. Fortunately for them people have less cause to experience, or even learn of, their unpleasantness. I think part of it might be that some of these people are incredibly creative but also incredibly focused on themselves and maybe that&#8217;s where some of their creativity stems from. </p>
<p>At the same time, nice as the idea of separating the creator from the creation is, if I were to learn that Rufus say, tortured kittens and kicked puppies, I really can&#8217;t see myself continuing to buy his music.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
